Process improvements - It doesn't matter how many times you review your material
The point is that if you review your material, you just have the same eyes looking at the same material again. These eyes can’t catch all the mistakes.
I have been working on one write-up for almost 3-4 hours, every time I re-review my write-up, I find a fault. I did re-review my content for around 3 times, and even in the third time I had some mistakes to correct. Because of this, I showed my content to another colleague of mine and even he caught a few mistakes in my write-up and that was it.
If you have been seeing something for really long, you won’t be able get everything right without having to get it reviewed. Or maybe, getting a review from someone else is the best way to produce the best write-up. Now I know why big organizations--with CXOs having seen the organizations grow--go to consulting companies like McKinsey/BCG/Bain to make process improvements in their organizations.
I have been working on one write-up for almost 3-4 hours, every time I re-review my write-up, I find a fault. I did re-review my content for around 3 times, and even in the third time I had some mistakes to correct. Because of this, I showed my content to another colleague of mine and even he caught a few mistakes in my write-up and that was it.
If you have been seeing something for really long, you won’t be able get everything right without having to get it reviewed. Or maybe, getting a review from someone else is the best way to produce the best write-up. Now I know why big organizations--with CXOs having seen the organizations grow--go to consulting companies like McKinsey/BCG/Bain to make process improvements in their organizations.
