Competition - Being in the wrong competition with the wrong talent

In a competitive environment, someone has to lose, that's how things really are. Overall, there are many competitions that we've been a part of and have done miserably; on a short enough timeline, the confidence level of the guy who did well in the competition is way above that of ours, but, on a long enough timeline, the results from that competition become invalid.

The main purpose of competition is to segregate (that's a no brainer) and then allocate a premium opportunity to one and a not-so-premium opportunity to the other...which is fair coz premium service will not remain premium if it is available to everyone. In the education system we have, the segregation process is very ineffective coz it only accounts for scores and nothing other than that.This isn't a real competition because a lot of us were pushed in the competition, and some of us did not even compete, and some of us were already better than the rest.

The real competition that I see is in Wimbledon (Federrer and Nadal), World Cup (India and Pakistan),  or Companies (Apple and Microsoft)...this is because all the guys in this competition has the following in common: *All the competitors have the same talent and want the same thing out of their talent*. What I am coming at is that "Most of the competitions we are in involves different talent requirements, and "Winning from or losing to someone in the competition is most probably a result of being in the wrong competition with the wrong talent" .

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

TV Channels ;-(

TITANIC SONG...version1.6

Wipro- Reporting day